In this study, a case of 5 year old child, 20kg,
height 120 cm was referred to Anaesthesia department for pre-operative
assessment before scheduling a dental restoration surgery. Child on general examination, was short stature and had difficulty in
speech with physiologically normal
vitals .There were clear facial looks of
Down syndrome with skin eczema
,high-arch palate and macroglossia. Child also had history of adenoids
infection. He had not received any dental treatment before. Labs reports were
normal. Since the child was uncooperative so, we discussed and decided that his
dental treatment would be done under general anaesthesia in a hospital setting.
After primary assessment and detailed history child was referred to a
cardiologist, and a general paediatrician, and dermatologist in order to clear
his medical status. Parents were explained about advantages and disadvantages
of the general anaesthesia and written consent was taken. They were also informed
about NPO guidelines. After clearance from cardiology and paediatrician and
dermatologist, child was scheduled for dental restoration surgery. Child was
premeditated with oral midazolam 10 mg half hour before surgery to reduce the
anxiety of child. Monitors like, pulse oximeter, ecg and bp, etco2, temp were
connected once child shifted in operation room. General anaesthesia was induced
by inhalation through 6 -8%sevoflurane
using a face mask along with 50:50 %oxygen and nitrous oxide .According to a
standard protocol, an iv line with 24 G cannula was secured medications were
given intravenously, Inj glycopyrolate 0.1 mg , Inj Propofol 40 mg ,
dexamethasone 2 mg and Inj Rocuronium10
mg iv was administered. Otrivin nasal
drops were put in both nostrils. Nasal intubation was tried blindly on right nostril
with 5 mm reinforced tube. There was difficulty in passing the tube so with
some extra adjustments tube was passed and fixed at 17cm and child was
ventilated. Ventilator showed high pressure and desaturation to 84 %. The air
entry was less bilaterally and child started desaturating. Etco2 waveform was
not coming proper. Bleeding was there in oral cavity on direct laryngoscopy. We
hand ventilated the child and noted resistance in tube .oral cavity and Endotrache
tube was suctioned but suction Cather did not pass well inside the tube.
Breathing circuit was again connected and on manual ventilation again
resistance was felt, there with
Minimal chest expansion on both sides with inadequate
tidal volume alarm on monitor. We then decided to remove the endotracheal tube
immediately. On examination of the removed Et tube we find soft tissue at the
tip, blocking the tube. It was possibly
adenoid tissue. Child was ventilated by mask and suction was done to clear the
oral cavity. Otrivin drops.05 % helped in vasoconstriction of the vessels. Once
bleeding was stopped by otolaryngologist and endoscopic assessment of nasal
cavity was requested. It was not done due to non-availability of small
paediatric size fibre optic endoscope in our centre. Now the plan was to try
nasal intubation or proceed with oral intubation for surgery. One more attempt
through other nostril was decided with a railroad technique. Left nostril was
chosen, liberal lubrication was done, Thermo-softening of the endotracheal
tubes was done and smaller size ET was selected. A 10 FG soft suction catheter
was passed through the floor of the nasal cavity, direct laryngoscopy done and
the once the tip of the catheter was visible in the oropharynx, the thumb
control part of suction Cather was cut. We used rail road technique to pass the
lubricated tracheal tube with gentle pressure on catheter. It passed very
smoothly. When the endotracheal tube was visible in the oropharynx, the
catheter was gently pulled off, and intubation can be done as usual with help
of magills forceps. This method is used
to reduce trauma and bleeding to the nasal passages and soft tip catheter acts
as nontraumatic pathfinder .Tube was well placed with good bilateral air entry.
The case was done in 2 hours. Intra-operatively, paracetamol 15 mg/kg was
given, along with Ringer’s Lactate 1?2 DNS 150 mL IV. In addition,
dexamethasone 2 mg IV was also given with Ondansetron 1.5 mg IV.