Patients aged 0-18 years, who were hospitalized in the
Oncology Clinic of our hospital between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2018 and
whose vitamin d was measured to evaluate the nutritional status at diagnosis,
constitute the patient group. A total of 44 children without chronic disease
and whose serum vitamin D levels were checked in our hospital were included in
the control group. The files of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. A
body temperature of >38 measured by the tympanic route was considered a
febrile condition. Cases with an absolute neutrophil count (ANS) <500/mm3
or an ANS <1500/mm3 and predicted to enter neutropenia were
considered as neutropenia. Neutropenia severity was evaluated according to the
number of ANS. An ANS <500/mm3 was considered severe neutropenia,
an ANS between 500-1000/mm3 was considered moderate neutropenia, and
an ANS between 1000-1500/mm3 was considered mild neutropenia. The
vitamin D levels of the cases who did not receive vitamin D support in the
first 2 months after diagnosis and who had an attack of febrile neutropenia;
the effects of febrile neutropenia on the time of occurrence (at the time of
diagnosis, within the first month and after the first month), severity and
duration were examined.
Time to recovery from neutropenia, number of days with
fever, presence of complications (mucositis, abscess, etc.), glycopeptide use
and antifungal use were evaluated. 25-oh vitamin d levels were studied by
liquid chromatography method.
A 25 OH Vitamin D level of ?15 ng/ml was considered as
deficiency, between <15-20 ng/ml as insufficient, 20-100 ng/ml as
sufficient, and >150 ng/ml as toxicity [6]. Ethics Committee Decision dated
09.07.2018 and file number 2018-100 was obtained from Health Sciences
University Ankara Pediatrics Hematology and Oncology Training and Research
Hospital. SPSS ('Statistical Package for the Social Sciences') program was used
for statistical analysis. The t-test was used to compare clinical parameters
between control and patient groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA,
Kruskal-Wallis test) was used for comparison between more than two groups.
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, and rate)
were used when evaluating the numerical study data. Mann Whitney U test was
used to compare the non-normally distributed variables. Fisher's exact test was
used to compare qualitative data. The results were evaluated at the 95%
confidence interval and the significance level of p <0.05.