The vast majority of universities arose as small ones
(with the exception of such examples as Stanford), for the needs of cities
(medicine, commerce, law) and as an intellectual guarantee of the sovereignty
of urban communes and municipalities. Science as an independent sphere was
formed in universities in the 16th and 17th centuries as an intellectual force
excessive for these cities (Table 1).

The peak of the genesis of universities in Europe
occurred in the 16th century, which formed the basis for the origin and
development of science. It took decades and even centuries for university
education to become a noticeable social phenomenon, the number of educated
people reached a certain point of crystallization of rather random activities
into scientific activities, methodologically designed and gained authority. The
war of town contra gown, "the city against the mantle", ended with a
convincing victory for education and science.

At the same time, cities, in conditions of an almost
unchanged socio-cultural situation, could quite articulately submit a request
for certain professions, while only universities themselves, elite "city
fathers", as well as the highest nobility and clergy could formulate an
educational request. In this regard, the early history of Moscow University is
instructive and indicative. It should be recalled that Moscow University opened
on January 25, 1755 in one of the rooms of the pharmacy at the Iversky Gate at
11 students. In 1809 (Speransky's educational reform), half a century later,
two faculties of the Moscow Imperial University, Medical (Medical, 248
students) and Law (Political, 222 students), focused on professional training,
and the other two, Mathematical (natural sciences – physics, chemistry,
biology, geography, etc.) are concentrated here - 37 students and Literature -
153 students have a general educational character. Nevertheless, the task of
forming "centaurs" - educated professionals as an intellectual elite
- was urgent for Europe, Russia, and the United States. Unfortunately, in our
country we have gone through and continue to go through so many reforms,
transformations, perestroika and reshaping of education, including university
education, that we have completely lost the fundamental, conceptual differences
between education and vocational training, which neither at the student level,
nor at the teacher level, nor at the public and state level, we can no longer
articulate, what we do in universities.
The current stage of university development is
reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities,
mostly ephemeral.
The current stage of university development is
reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities,
mostly ephemeral.
The development of small universities can be
characterized by a number of stages in their life cycle:
The current stage of university development is
reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities,
mostly ephemeral.
1. The
emergence of an educational idea or the emergence/consciousness of an
educational request/target group.
2. Formation
of the content of education based on the educational idea itself, opportunities
and request of participants and target audience. At this stage there is
formation of norms of activity, fixation of values and organizational
structures of the university.
3. Presumably,
small universities, having passed the stage of formalization of educational
content and internal structure, can develop variably:
· in this state they can
function for a long time, working for their target group;
· may be transformed in the
future into another organization, including a state educational institution or
an institution of additional education, if this was not done initially, or
become part of another educational structure;
· Can end its existence if
the educational request has been fulfilled, and the leader and his followers
are absent at the moment.
The logic of development of small universities as a
mobile academic community of professionals and learners seems to be as follows:
from the realization of the educational idea and acquisition of the target
group through the development of content and internal structure to a new status
or liquidation.
In the framework of the study “Small University” [3] a
functional-genetic typology of small universities was developed:
The functional-genetic typology is not exhaustive, but
it sets a conceptual space for describing all possible variants of small and
urban universities. For a more complete description it is necessary to
introduce a historical vector: the already past real history of the university
and the upcoming alternative perspectives.
However, not all types of universities are real:
Possible functional and genetic types of mini-universities (Table 3).
Thus, out of 36 theoretically possible, only 13 are
actually possible, but they create a rather motley and complex picture of small
universities.
The theoretical model of a small university can be
formulated in the following scheme (Figure1):
One of the results of social development is a set of
required and or promising professions, the most important factor of social
development is the educational frontier.
Modern small universities differ from their
predecessors in conceptuality - the elaboration and detail of their concept,
from which unfolds the organizational project of the university and its basic
processes: scientific and project activities, educational and professional
training. In general, the concept can be presented as follows (of course, each
concept is unique in content) [3] (Figure 2).
As an example, the concept of the Invisible University
is proposed, targeting residents of Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees in Europe
[2]. This concept was proposed in October 2023.