Two classical models
were used to measure behaviour intention as follows:
Theory
of reasoned action - TRA
The Theory of Reasoned Action was first
developed in 1967 by Fishbein, and then modified and extended [1]. According to
this theory, the individuals have the basis and motivation in their
decision-making process and make a reasonable choice among the best solutions
and tools to judge whether their behaviour is an intention which is determined
by their behavioural intention (BI). Behavioural intention will be influenced
by attitudes and subjective norms to behavioural intention (Figure 1).

Figure
1: Theory of
reasoned action – TRA model.
Theory
of planned behaviour – TPB
Developed from the Theory of Reasoned Action
[1]. This theory was created due to limitations of the previous theory on
assuming that human behaviour is purely due to rational control. Similar to
TRA, the central factor of the Theory of Planned Behaviour is the individual’s
intention to perform a certain behaviour (Figure 2).

Figure
2: Theory of
planned behaviour - TPB model.
The information seeking
has positive impacts on systematic information processing. The demand for
information stimulates people to seek and process the information
systematically. Its work’s findings also revealed that the higher the intent to
seek information, the more thorough and systematic the information processing
will be (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Model.
Based on the above
mentioned theories, the following hypotheses were built in order to re-check
the relationship between systematic information processing, risk perception,
benefit perception and information sharing behaviour on social media.
H1:
Perceived knowledge about data security has a negative impact on users’ lack of
information about data security on social media
The concept of gaps, or
lack of knowledge, as defined in the work on “interplay between knowledge gap
and perceived risk in motivating risk information seeking” (Shadi Shakeri,
Nicholas Evangelopoulos and Oksana Zavalina) are related to the concept of lack
of information, used in the Risk Information Seeking and Processing model
(RISP), and The Planned Risk Information Seeking model (PRISM) [2]. Lack of
information is defined as the difference between an individual’s current
knowledge and the amount of information he/she deems necessary, in order to
deal with a given situation (ie, well-informed). However, the knowledge gap, as
defined herein, refers to realizing such differences. In view of lack of
information, a more cognitive approach to information gap is adopted, removing
emotional factors. The current study has been carried out based on the
classical concept of knowledge gap as a cognitive-emotional driver for
information seeking.
H2:
Perceived knowledge on data security has negative impacts on information
seeking about data security on social networks
According to people
rarely need information for information only, but they need it as a means to
serve different purposes [3]. The works in health risks confirm that people
actively seek information on risks they are aware that they are facing a
crucial decision i.e. when topics become relevant and important for them. The
Information Searching Process Model claims that the information searching is
initiated when a person becomes aware about the lack of information he or she
needs in order to understand a problem or perform a specific activity. Focusing
on this cognitive aspect of the information searching process, ASK (Anomalous
State of Knowledge) model also states that the gap between the available
information and the desired one reflects a person’s information needs,
motivating him/her to seek information [4,5].
H3:
Information insufficiency has positive impacts on information seeking about
data security on social networks
The concept of Lack of
information in the RISP model is derived from the Completeness principle in the
heuristic?systematic model of which people are cognitively optimistic and
always make the least possible effort however, they can easily try harder if
motivated [6,7]. The Completeness principle suggests that people are “capable
of trying until they are confident enough that they have well accomplished
their set goals”. When an individual’s current knowledge does not meet the
level of confidence to fulfil his or her goals, they may fall into a lack of
information. Then, according to the RISP model, when such lack of information
reaches high enough, such persons start searching for information. In addition,
then, he/she is more motivated to participate in systematic processing
(in-depth and thorough evaluation of information) rather than in empirical
processing (superficial evaluation of information).
H4:
Systematic information processing is positively influenced by perceived
knowledge about data security
Background knowledge is
a factor affecting the hypothetical information processing in the HSM system
[8]. The previous literature has shown that the background knowledge has
positive impact on the systematic information processing. Trumbo and McComas
have shown that people are motivated and capable of applying the systematic
strategies to process information as they acquire more knowledge. “Systematic
information processing is positively affected by available knowledge” is also
supported after accreditation.
H5:
Information seeking has impacts on systematic processing
The systematic
processing is deliberative and conducted by analysing, comparing, and judging
information, whereas heuristic processing is based on simple decision rules to
arrive at a judgment [9]. HSM assumes that individuals often perceive things in
a simplified way and that heuristic processing is preferred because it requires
less effort. However, the heuristic processing tends to make subsequent
judgments and behaviours less stable than the systematic one. Therefore, the
authors have used the systematic processing to put into the model and test
hypotheses [10].
H6:
Information insufficiency has impacts on systematic processing
The lack of information
is again influenced by affective responses to risks (emotions) and
informational subjective norms. Firstly, strong emotional responses such as
anxiety or anger are likely to worsen the lack of information, which in turn
leads to information seeking. Secondly, the lack of information is influenced
by the informational subjective norms. Those norms refer to individuals’
perceptions of whether others think they should know about a particular risk,
and the higher they are, the worse the lack of information becomes. Recently,
have noted that the informational subjective norms do not only indirectly
influence the information searching and processing due to the lack of
information but can also directly affect the same [11].
H7:
Systematic processing has impacts on perceived risks
Information processing
is another determinant of risk perception. The previous scholars have extended
the information processing model according to the HSM to figure out influences
of the information processing on individuals’ risks.
H8:
Systematic processing has impacts on perceived benefits
In the study on
“Consumers’ perception and information processing affect their acceptance of
genetically modified foods in China: A risk communication perspective'' it was
assumed that the benefit perception directly affects the consumers’ purchasing
intentions for the same. However, the influence of benefit perception on
information processing has not been proposed in previous studies. The perceived
benefit has positive impacts on the systematic processing”. The hypothesis set
as the following model has been proved to be significant, thereby confirming
the relationship of perceived benefits and systematic processing. However,
there still exists a research gap in the social network context in Vietnam, so
in order to test the relationship between the systematic processing and the
perceived values, the authors have made a hypothesis that the systematic
processing has impacts on perceived benefits.
H9:
Perceived knowledge about data security has positive impacts on data security
perceived risks
The studies with
various findings have been performed on relationship the perceived knowledge
about data security and perceived risks of the same. The work formalized the
relationships between the three constructs, by considering knowledge gap as
both a cause of perceived risk and a driver for information seeking. The
knowledge gap is recognized by individuals when “they encounter differences or
lack of awareness in their environment” Many scientific literature has
considered uncertainty as a component of perceived risk and have found a link
between the knowledge gap and the sense of uncertainty or perceived risk [12].
The study, has hypothesized: The knowledge gap has positive impacts on data
security risk perception.
H10:
Perceived risks have negative impacts on intention to share information on
social networks
According, there are 5
factors of risk perception that often come into mind, consisting of: financial,
performance, physical, psychological, and social risk. In addition, pointed out
that time risk perception is also an important component of risk perception
factor group. The time risk perception is related to the perception of time
loss, convenience. The time risk perception is more common in online situations
and social media; and many studies have shown that the time/convenience risk is
the Consumers’ experience of inconvenience and time consuming due to
difficulties in website navigation or data security. In the current growing
social network context, users’ sharing information through social networks
hides a certain degree of risk.
H11:
Data security perceived benefits have positive impacts on a users’ intention to
share information on social networks
Intention is seen as a
direct predictor of actual behaviour. The stronger a participant’s intention or
attempt for behaviour is, the more successful they are expected to be in
implementing that behaviour. However, the degree of success will depend not
only on one’s wishes or intentions, but also on non-material factors such as
availability of necessary opportunities and resources (for example: time,
money, skills, cooperation of others, etc.) To the extent that a person has the
necessary opportunities and resources and intends to behave, he/she will be
successful in executing such behaviour, the intention will be the correct
predictor of the actual behaviour [13].
H12:
Impact of intention on the behaviour of sharing information on social networks
The intention is a driver of human consciousness
to take action [14,15]. The intention to continue sharing information on social
networks is what users think they will decide whether to continue sharing
information or not argues that intention is considered to be an indicator of
the degree of willingness to approach a certain behaviour and their attempt to
do the same. In addition, the research model mentioned in H11 also confirms
that the intention to share information positively affects information sharing
behaviour on online communities. So whether the intention to continue sharing
information on social networks really affects the behaviour of sharing the same
or not, if so, what is its influence degree, impact on the behaviour? To answer
this question, the research team proposed the research hypothesis: Impact of
intention on the behaviours of sharing information on social networks.