Sad to say, most people have not realised that this
is a peoples’ war against corona virus. They have to regularly practice
preventive methods every day. Governments’ primary role is to facilitate this
by informing people about preventive methods. Next role of diagnosing and
treating starts only when people fail to prevent getting infected, when they
can. Everyone has to be always conscious of their responsibility and ensure their
full continuous participation in the war even if they have to suffer temporary
difficulties. Moreover, everyone has to be conscious that delays in practice of
these preventive measures will enable viruses to go deeper into body and cause
irreparable harm and strictly avoid delays.
Some people are complacent and do not accept
necessity of these or any methods. The fact that majority of cases do not have
symptoms and, though apparently healthy, can spread infection by a virus with
strong damaging capacity is convincing enough for
- Accepting
that risk is real and
- Systematically
practicing all preventive measures
- Some
advantages of these methods are
- These
do not do any harm,
- Do
not need any equipments or supplies or payment for service and
- Second
and third methods, which are most effective in keeping viruses out of the body,
are very easy because these together need half a minute only, each time.
All that is needed to defeat corona virus is
determination of everyone to regularly practice these easy methods. Then, all
can rejoice that new cases have been prevented and lock down can be avoided for
improving economy and education system quickly. People can then be proud of all
these praiseworthy achievements.
Lessons
from this article
These methods are based on giving importance to mode
of entry of viruses and on how to prevent this entry – an innovative approach
which did not give importance to vaccination, diagnosis and treatment because
prevention of cases makes these irrelevant. If scientists follow such innovative
approaches they can contribute more to solve health problems.
For example, the very brief exposures when viruses
remain in the body before being thrown out by the new methods may help to
develop immunity against the viruses. This aspect deserves further study by
scientists.
There are more disease agents which enter body
through nose and/or month. It is important to investigate whether a daily habit
of using the second and third methods, which together take only half a minute,
can prevent their entry into the body and prevent disease.
Tuberculosis is a major global health problem caused
mainly by entry of tubercle bacilli through the nose. The article has pointed
out that years of research could not help to eradicate tuberculosis and
emphasised on importance of innovative research [1]. It had also given
suggestions for some possible innovative investigations. In addition to
investigating these suggestions, the present article implies that whether daily
practice of these new methods can help to prevent tuberculosis should be
investigated with an open mind.
For example, because most children get infected
before 14 years of age but develop only a primary focus of tuberculosis and get
disease only later on, a group of children about 5 years from a high tuberculosis
prevalence area can be selected and investigated as follows: Divide them
randomly into two groups. One group should be asked to regularly use the second
and third methods daily and the other group kept as a control group. These
groups should be monitored strictly for sufficient number of years. At the end
of each year, the children of both study and control groups should be
investigated for evidence of primary focus. If significantly less number of
children in study group has primary focus, it shows that the new methods can
prevent infection. This finding will be a very important contribution to
eradicating tuberculosis. On the negative side, scientists ought to seriously
question the importance given to vaccination. It takes years (may be 10 years?)
to develop a vaccine. Mass production of vaccine and vaccinating millions also
take time. This means vaccination can prevent the disease only after many years
and incidence of disease will continue unabated meanwhile. A sophisticated cold
chain has to be set up if not present already. Whereas the new methods prevent
immediately and do not need any money or elaborate organization, large amounts
of money for developing a vaccine, a sophisticated cold chain and setting up an
organization are needed to vaccinate people to prevent incidence of cases after
a delay of many years only. Even this may be a complete loss if the organism
mutates in a manner which will call for discarding the vaccine.
A serious problem is that scientists have to change
their minds to avoid present type of research which has failed to give results
and give priority to innovative methods (even if some of them may appear to be
silly). This change is likely to take time unless special efforts are made.
I will not be
surprised if some scientists scoff at the new methods suggested without trying
these for 2 or 3 months with an open mind. Proverbs exhort: “It is better to
try and fail than fail to try” and “Failures are stepping stones for success”.
Successful scientists and inventors believed in this and boldly conducted
experiments.