Variables
affected by NPWT
Cutaneous
capillary network can be investigated with regards to blood flow (BF), velocity
(VELO), postcapillary oxygen saturation (StO2), and relative hemoglobin content
(rHb) [11].
Blood
Flow (BF)
Regardless
of the application of different pressure levels, intervals of suction and
cutaneous blood flow below the foam dressing were significantly enhanced in all
three types.
Post-capillary
Tissue Oxygen Saturation (StO2)
Corresponding
to enhancements in cutaneous BF, StO2-values steadily increased when suction
was active.
Relative Hemoglobin
Content (rHb) and Red Blood Cell Velocity (VELO)
Both
parameters were significantly altered due to the NPWT stimulus.
Pain/Discomfort
As
expected, reported levels of discomfort were nominal. No statistic difference
was found in comparison of maximum values between groups (p > 0.05).
Surface Pressure
Applied
suction caused significant changes in the surface pressure (sp) of the
underlying skin.
Remote Effects
Cutaneous
microcirculation of the contralateral thigh was also affected by NPWT
treatment. It shows virtually a linear increase in BF 90 min in all three
types.
Advantage
of cyclic NPWT
- Less painful when compared to
intermittent NPWT.
- Superior
effects on local and remote cutaneous perfusion in the cyclic type compared to
others.
Disadvantage
of cyclic NPWT
- Requires
expansive devices to fluctuate between sub atmospheric pressure.
- To perform cyclic NPWT in classic
suction device is cumbersome.
An
ideal application of a NPWT dressing must respect the individual circumstances
of each patient and treated wounds with respect to comorbidities, location of
the wound, and tissue composition [22].